One of the first things the insurance company will look for after a vehicle collision is whether you had any injuries before the crash happened.
Maybe you had back surgery a few years ago. Maybe you’ve been treating a shoulder issue or dealing with chronic neck pain. Whatever it is, the insurance adjuster is going to find it in your medical records.
And they’re going to try to use it against you.
If you’ve been hurt in a car collision and you have a previous injury, don’t assume your claim is over before it starts. A pre-existing condition does not disqualify you from seeking compensation. But it does mean you need to understand how insurance companies handle these situations and what you can do to protect yourself.
No. Having a previous injury does not mean you can’t recover compensation after a vehicle collision. This is a common fear, and insurance companies count on it.
The law recognizes something called the “eggshell plaintiff” rule. This legal principle says that the person who caused your accident must take you as they find you.
If you had a vulnerable back and the crash made it worse, the at-fault driver is responsible for that worsening.
The accident has to have made things worse. That’s the line. And the insurance company wants to blur the lines.
Insurance adjusters have a playbook for handling claims that involve previous injuries, and they use it aggressively.
This is a strategy, not an honest evaluation of your claim. The fact that you had a previous injury doesn’t mean the accident didn’t make things significantly worse.
In personal injury cases, aggravation means the latest incident caused your pre-existing condition to get worse than it was before.
Here are some real-world examples:
In each of these situations, the at-fault driver is responsible for the difference between where you were before the accident and where you are after it.
That difference is what your claim is about.
When a pre-existing condition is part of your claim, medical records become the most important piece of evidence you have.
Without clear documentation, the insurance company has room to argue that your current symptoms were already there before the crash.
If you stop going to appointments or delay care, the insurance company will argue your injuries aren’t that serious.
Stay consistent with your treatment plan and be honest with your doctors about your full medical history.
Your doctors are your strongest allies here. When they clearly document the before-and-after of your condition, it becomes much harder for the insurance company to dismiss the impact of the collision.
Yes. Every time. Without exception.
Your attorney needs to know about every prior injury, surgery, and ongoing condition. Not so they can hide it – so they can prepare for it.
The insurance company is going to find your medical history. That’s a given.
Trying to hide a previous injury almost always backfires. If the insurance company discovers something you didn’t disclose, it damages your credibility and can weaken your entire claim. Honesty is the stronger position.
Previous injury cases require more preparation, more documentation, and a deeper understanding of how to present medical evidence. They’re not impossible cases. But they do require someone who knows how to handle the insurance company’s pushback.
At Hess Injury Law, we’ve worked with clients throughout Hermiston and Eastern Oregon who had pre-existing conditions before their accidents. We know how to work with medical providers to clearly document what the crash changed, and we know how to present that evidence in a way that gets fair results.
If you’ve been injured in a vehicle crash and you’re worried that a previous injury will hurt your claim, talk to us before you talk to the insurance company.
Contact Hess Injury Law today to discuss your situation.
Disclaimer: The content of this blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel.
Disclaimer: The content of this blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel.